Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984: Relevancy and Admissibility MCQs 2026

39 questions with detailed answers · 24 from past papers · 4 quiz batches available

📚 Judiciary And Law📄 24 Past-Paper Qs✓ Free · No Login Needed
🎯 Mock Test

Read each question, think about the answer, then click Show Answer to reveal the correct option and explanation. Load 10 at a time so it stays manageable — perfect for one-topic study sessions on the bus or during a break.

Page 1 of 1Questions 110 of 39
  1. Q1hard

    Oral admissions as to contents of documents are restricted under

    1. AArticle 30 without limit
    2. BArticle 35 QSO—document rule of best evidence
    3. CArticle 112
    4. DArticle 136
    💡 Explanation:

    Document contents generally proved by document itself per Arts.72–76.

  2. Q2Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSmedium

    Electronic record relevancy/admissibility is recognized under

    1. Anot recognized at all in Pakistan
    2. Bonly in civil cases never criminal
    3. CArticle 2 read with Article 73 and Electronic Transactions Ordinance
    4. Donly through dying declaration
    💡 Explanation:

    Electronic records are integrated in modern QSO framework.

  3. Q3hard

    Admissions cannot be proved by

    1. Adirect statement of party
    2. Bhearsay upon hearsay unless exception applies
    3. Cdocument signed by party
    4. Dagent within authority
    💡 Explanation:

    Foundation must satisfy general hearsay and admission rules.

  4. Q4Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSShard

    Confession affecting co-accused may be considered under

    1. AArticle 43 QSO with great caution and corroboration
    2. Bautomatic conviction of co-accused
    3. Cno judicial scrutiny
    4. Donly in civil cases
    💡 Explanation:

    Joint trial confessions require careful separate scrutiny.

  5. Q5hard

    Character evidence in civil defamation where character is in issue follows

    1. AArticle 66 bars all character proof always
    2. BArticle 38 governs
    3. Cexceptions to Article 66 general exclusion
    4. DArticle 112 list only
    💡 Explanation:

    When character itself is in issue, proof may be allowed.

  6. Q6hard

    Relevancy of judgments in civil cases for estoppel may interact with

    1. ACPC section 11 res judicata and QSO Article 54–57 limits
    2. BPPC section 302 only
    3. COrder XXI execution only
    4. DArticle 136 leading questions only
    💡 Explanation:

    Res judicata is substantive; evidentiary use of judgments is narrower in criminal law.

  7. Q7medium

    Article 32 QSO makes admissions by persons whose estate is in question relevant when

    1. Aafter interest ends always without exception
    2. Bstatements are made during continuance of interest
    3. Conly in police station
    4. Donly if written on stamp paper always
    💡 Explanation:

    Successor-in-interest admissions bind within limits.

  8. Q8hard

    Article 43 QSO addresses when confession may be proved against maker and

    1. Aco-accused/parties as provided with safeguards
    2. Bagainst anyone without trial
    3. Conly in civil suits for divorce
    4. Dnever against maker
    💡 Explanation:

    Confession of one may implicate another only within strict rules.

  9. Q9Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSmedium

    Article 45 QSO provides that admissions are

    1. Anot conclusive proof but may operate as estoppel
    2. Balways conclusive
    3. Cnever relevant
    4. Donly oral never documentary
    💡 Explanation:

    Admissions are strong but not always conclusive.

  10. Q10medium

    Article 48 QSO on books of account requires entries to be

    1. Aonly if attested by two witnesses always
    2. Bonly police records
    3. Ckept in regular course of business to be relevant
    4. Donly registered documents
    💡 Explanation:

    Business books may corroborate but seldom alone prove heavy claims.

  11. Q11Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSmedium

    Fresh evidence on appeal is not relevancy chapter but admissibility at trial distinguishes

    1. Athey are identical always
    2. Brelevancy never matters
    3. Crelevancy (logical connection) from admissibility (legal permission)
    4. Dadmissibility is irrelevant for courts
    💡 Explanation:

    Fact may be relevant yet inadmissible due to exclusionary rule.

  12. Q12hard

    Article 42 QSO makes relevant

    1. Aprivate diary entries unrelated to custom
    2. Bstatements as to public rights or customs by persons of reputed knowledge
    3. Cconfessions to police
    4. Dleading questions in chief always
    💡 Explanation:

    Community reputation on public rights/custom may be excepted.

  13. Q13medium

    Article 61 QSO covers opinions on handwriting by

    1. Aperson acquainted with handwriting or expert under Article 59
    2. Bany passerby without knowledge
    3. Conly accused
    4. Donly police officer in all cases
    💡 Explanation:

    Non-expert acquainted with handwriting may give opinion.

  14. Q14easy

    Facts bearing on quantum of damages may be relevant under

    1. AArticle 35 confessions only
    2. Bgeneral relevancy provisions and facts in issue framework
    3. CArticle 58 character always
    4. DArticle 46 judicial notice exclusively
    💡 Explanation:

    Damages require proof of loss facts that are relevant and admissible.

  15. Q15medium

    An admission of fact does not by itself prove

    1. Aany evidentiary value ever
    2. Blegal conclusion if law requires independent proof of certain elements
    3. Cestoppel in any context
    4. Dbinding effect on party
    💡 Explanation:

    Admissions bind on facts admitted but law still governs elements.

  16. Q16easy

    Relevancy of age in cases involving minority may involve

    1. AArticle 59 expert or documentary proof like birth entries under other Articles
    2. BArticle 57 character rule
    3. CArticle 35 police confession
    4. DArticle 140 only
    💡 Explanation:

    Age is fact provable like any other fact in issue.

  17. Q17medium

    Article 16 QSO makes relevant existence of course of business when

    1. Asupporting inference that act was done in ordinary course
    2. Bproving character in civil conduct
    3. Cproving police confession
    4. Dproving foreign judgment always conclusively
    💡 Explanation:

    Business course supports regularity inference under relevancy chapter.

  18. Q18Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSeasy

    The Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984 governs

    1. Aonly criminal investigation by police
    2. Bonly contract drafting
    3. Cadmissibility and relevancy of evidence in courts in Pakistan
    4. Donly court fees
    💡 Explanation:

    QSO is Pakistan's principal evidence law for civil and criminal proceedings.

  19. Q19Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSeasy

    Article 2(c) QSO defines "fact" to include

    1. Aonly written documents
    2. Bany thing, state of things, or relation of things capable of being perceived by the senses
    3. Conly expert opinions without basis
    4. Donly legal propositions
    💡 Explanation:

    Facts are sensory or mental conditions as defined in Article 2.

  20. Q20Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSeasy

    Article 18 QSO provides that evidence may be given of

    1. Aonly character of parties always
    2. Bfacts in issue and relevant facts
    3. Conly hearsay statements freely
    4. Donly public documents
    💡 Explanation:

    Trial evidence is confined to facts in issue and those made relevant by the Order.

  21. Q21Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSmedium

    A fact in issue means under Article 2(g)

    1. Aany background gossip
    2. Bonly judge's personal knowledge
    3. Conly future speculative events always
    4. Dfact from which right, liability, or disability asserted or denied arises
    💡 Explanation:

    Facts in issue directly support or defeat the cause.

  22. Q22Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSeasy

    Article 30 QSO defines admission as

    1. Aa statement oral or documentary which suggests any inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact
    2. Bonly confession to police
    3. Conly expert report
    4. Donly dying declaration
    💡 Explanation:

    Admissions are acknowledgments against interest; wider than confession.

  23. Q23Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSeasy

    Admissions by a party to the proceeding are relevant under

    1. AArticle 112 only
    2. BArticle 31 QSO
    3. CArticle 73 only
    4. DArticle 136 only
    💡 Explanation:

    Party admissions bind in proceedings subject to exceptions.

  24. Q24Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSmedium

    Admissions are generally

    1. Aalways false
    2. Binadmissible in civil cases
    3. Cnot conclusive proof but may operate as estoppel
    4. Donly usable in criminal prosecution
    💡 Explanation:

    Admissions are strong evidence though court may require corroboration in some contexts.

  25. Q25Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSmedium

    A confession under QSO must relate to

    1. Aany personal habit unrelated to case
    2. Bcivil contract terms only in all cases
    3. Coffence charged or relevant to it
    4. Dcharacter only
    💡 Explanation:

    Confession is admission of guilt in criminal context per Article 30 onward.

  26. Q26Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSeasy

    Article 37 QSO renders confession irrelevant if caused by

    1. Avoluntary disclosure without pressure
    2. Baccused's own writing without coercion
    3. Cinducement, threat or promise from a person in authority
    4. Dstatement before any person
    💡 Explanation:

    Involuntary confessions are excluded for reliability and fairness.

  27. Q27Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSmedium

    Confession to police officer is generally inadmissible under

    1. AArticle 31
    2. BArticle 38 QSO
    3. CArticle 46
    4. DArticle 73
    💡 Explanation:

    Police confessions are excluded; custodial confessions are further restricted under Art.39.

  28. Q28Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSmedium

    Confession by accused while in police custody is restricted under

    1. AArticle 38 without any exception
    2. BArticle 66
    3. CArticle 85 only
    4. DArticle 39 QSO subject to discovery-of-fact exception in Article 40
    💡 Explanation:

    Custodial statements are excluded except limited discovery-of-fact proof.

  29. Q29Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSeasy

    A dying declaration is relevant under

    1. AArticle 30 only for all statements
    2. BArticle 46 QSO when the cause of death of the declarant comes into question
    3. CArticle 73 for documents only
    4. DArticle 136 for leading questions
    💡 Explanation:

    Statement as to cause of death or circumstances is admissible though declarant dead.

  30. Q30Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSmedium

    Dying declaration is an exception to

    1. Athe rule against leading questions only
    2. Bdocumentary evidence rules only
    3. Cburden of proof always shifting to defence in every civil case
    4. Dthe hearsay rule because necessity and solemnity of situation
    💡 Explanation:

    Trustworthiness derives from belief of impending death.

  31. Q31medium

    Multiple dying declarations may be evaluated by court considering

    1. Aonly the longest one automatically
    2. Bnone if police recorded without more
    3. Cconsistency, voluntariness and surrounding circumstances
    4. Donly if signed by doctor always as sole rule
    💡 Explanation:

    Corroboration may be considered though not always legally mandatory in all cases.

  32. Q32Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSeasy

    Facts of which the Court must take judicial notice are listed in

    1. AArticle 112 QSO
    2. BArticle 30
    3. CArticle 73
    4. DArticle 117
    💡 Explanation:

    Court shall take judicial notice of listed matters without formal proof.

  33. Q33Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSmedium

    Under Article 112, the Court must take judicial notice of

    1. Aprivate diary entries
    2. Bevery hearsay rumour
    3. Cunverified social media posts always
    4. Dlaws in force in Pakistan and other matters specified
    💡 Explanation:

    Judicial notice dispenses with proof of notorious/legal facts.

  34. Q34Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSmedium

    In civil cases, evidence of character to prove conduct is generally irrelevant under

    1. AArticle 67
    2. BArticle 66 QSO
    3. CArticle 37
    4. DArticle 73
    💡 Explanation:

    Character is excluded to prove conduct in civil litigation except as provided.

  35. Q35Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSmedium

    In criminal cases, good character of accused is relevant under

    1. AArticle 66
    2. BArticle 38
    3. CArticle 67 QSO
    4. DArticle 112 only
    💡 Explanation:

    Good character may support credibility; bad character generally excluded except rebuttal contexts.

  36. Q36Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSShard

    Previous bad character of accused is generally not relevant except

    1. Awhen character is itself in issue or rebuttal as provided in Article 68
    2. Bin every theft case automatically
    3. Cwhenever prosecution wishes
    4. Din all civil suits
    💡 Explanation:

    Prosecution may not ordinarily attack character first.

  37. Q37Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSeasy

    The hearsay rule means

    1. Aall documents are inadmissible
    2. Bwitnesses need not appear
    3. Coral evidence must be direct and hearsay statements are inadmissible except where law permits
    4. Dexpert opinion is always hearsay
    💡 Explanation:

    Article 71 requires direct oral evidence subject to exceptions like Art.46.

  38. Q38Past Paper · PPSC/FPSC/CSSeasy

    Article 71 QSO requires oral evidence to be

    1. Aalways second-hand from another person
    2. Bonly through interpreters without appearance
    3. Cdirect—witness who perceived fact by senses or otherwise competent circumstance
    4. Donly written without oral testimony
    💡 Explanation:

    Primary rule excludes hearsay unless exception applies.

  39. Q39hard

    Res gestae statements may be relevant under

    1. AArticle 66 always
    2. BArticle 85 only
    3. CArticle 136 only
    4. DArticle 19 QSO as statements forming part of same transaction
    💡 Explanation:

    Spontaneous statements accompanying transaction can be admissible.